Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

A CRITICALLY IMPORTANT PAPER

September 15, 2021 By Phil Hickey |

INTRODUCTION

I have recently read:

‘The Explanation You Have Been Looking For’: Neurobiology as Promise and Hermeneutic Closure

The piece was written by Joseph E. Davis, PhD, Research Professor of the Institute of Advanced Studies in Culture, University of Virginia.  It was published online by Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry on the 5th of August, 2021.

ABSTRACT

Here’s the paper’s abstract, quoted in full:

“The biomedical aspiration of psychiatry has fundamentally reoriented clinical practice since the DSM-III in 1980 and reverberated in the public sphere. Over time, lay public understanding of the causes of mental suffering has increasingly endorsed biological conceptions. In this paper, I explore the sources from which a neurobiological model for mental suffering reaches ordinary people, and investigate its rhetorical appeal, personal appropriation, and consequences. Drawing on interviews and other data, I show that these sources—physicians, popular media, and advertising—share common ontological and moral assumptions. These assumptions, in turn, influence how people take up neurobiological explanation to account for their suffering, and how, paradoxically, they join it to their projects of self-determination. I conclude by considering how, from a phenomenological perspective, a neurobiological account fails to enhance self-knowledge or determination but leads to a hermeneutic dead end.”

MAIN THEMES

There’s a lot of material in the article and in the abstract.  Note the phrases: “The biomedical aspiration of psychiatry has fundamentally reoriented clinical practice…”; and “…over time, lay public understanding of the causes of mental suffering has increasingly endorsed biological conceptions”; and “…a neurobiological account fails to enhance self-knowledge or determination but leads to a hermeneutic dead end”; etc.

Throughout the article Dr. Davis provides an abundance of evidence for these themes, and links their sources unambiguously to psychiatrists, medical websites, “screening days”, “educational” programs, autobiographical stories, social media, and pharma advertising.

SOME ILLUSTRATIVE QUOTES

“Despite a claim to be atheoretical with respect to etiology, the whole range of mental disorders would come to be regarded as primarily physical illnesses, ‘just like heart disease or diabetes’ to quote the American Psychiatric Association (Davis 2020; Harrington 2019; Whooley 2019).”

“In this paper, I explore the channels through which a neurobiological model for mental suffering, popularly known as a ‘chemical imbalance,’ reaches ordinary people and with what promises to them and consequences for them. My evidence is drawn from interviews with members of the lay public about how they account for everyday suffering, as well as related studies and the writing of psychiatrists.”

“Toward the end of her history of psychiatry’s long search for the biology of mental illness, the historian Anne Harrington poses the following question. She begins by noting that a century ago, doctors were diagnosing patients with fictive maladies like ‘bad nerves’ and ‘neurasthenia’ and knew by then that nothing was actually wrong with their ‘nerves.’ The patients, she writes, ‘may or may not have known, or they may or may not have cared.’ They may not have cared because having a medical label for their suffering provided institutional acknowledgment of its gravity and a ‘coherent explanation for real symptoms.’ Similarly, today, she writes:

Patients present with acute mental or emotional distress, and doctors look for a DSM diagnosis that will make sense of their suffering … [and] prescribe drugs … By acting this way, general practitioners and psychiatrists perpetuate the fiction that the drugs they are prescribing are correcting biochemical deficiencies caused by disease, much as (say) a prescription of insulin corrects a biochemical deficiency caused by diabetes.

And her question: ‘Is this wrong?” (Harrington 2019: 273).”

“Our social character and concrete and situated way of being-in-the-world are replaced by a ‘kind of tinker-toy self,’ composed of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that can be easily detached and laid aside or reconfigured into a new, but momentary self-configuration (Cushman 2002, cited in Aho 2019). And medication is imagined as a technology that can facilitate this cutting and reassembling. Such an account does not clarify or enhance or restore self and self-determination. By rejecting the sources of meaning and connection that make self-knowledge possible, they disavow them.

To Harrington’s question, is perpetuating this debunked biochemical deficiency theory wrong? The answer must be affirmative.”

CONCLUSION

This is a must-read piece.  It embraces many of the topics that are central to the anti-psychiatry position, and marshals compelling arguments for its final conclusion:  that perpetuating the biochemical deficiency theory is simply wrong.

Please read, discuss, and pass along.  There are five pages of references for those who wish to delve further into these critically important topics.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Disclosure:  I had no role in the creation of this scholarly piece, and have no financial interest in its dissemination.  I am promoting it here purely on its merits, scope, utility, depth of analysis, and relevance.

Filed Under: A Behavioral Approach to Mental Disorders

About Phil Hickey

I am a licensed psychologist, presently retired. I have worked in clinical and managerial positions in the mental health, corrections, and addictions fields in the United States and England. My wife Nancy and I have been married since 1970 and have four grown children.

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2023