Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

potential lawsuit

October 6, 2014 By A reader |

This post was submitted by a reader.

To sue or not to sue. I welcome any thoughts . . . lay and/or psych opinions about the following matter. Most of the following was taken from a statement written by the patient’s daughter.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . my mother and I took my father to the emergency room at Hospital due to concerns regarding his diabetes. He had not taken his insulin for several days and was having uncharacteristic confusion along with large thirst for water . . . when the woman who checked us in learned that he was diabetic, he was checked in and taken immediately to one of the rooms. My mother and I accompanied him. . . . a nurse took his blood sugar and measured it to be 485, which she said “wasn’t bad.” While in the emergency room, he continued to behave strangely, but seemed to be in good spirits. He was in good spirits and conversed with several members of staff and told them that someday he would be on TV.

Taken from ER notes timed at 1535 Chief complaint: Acting weird for last few days, talking to TV, talking about moving into old house he lost, making comments about meeting dead parents, inappropriate laughing for 4-5 days, almost walked into traffic.  Social History: Denies currently thinking of harming self or others. Says “I’m looking into doing marijuana (business?).” “I’m going to become homeless so I can get some free food.” Around 1550 we were to1d that he would be going back to an “assessment center” and that only one family member could accompany him. I went with him. We followed a large man (former defensive lineman?) back to the assessment center. He was walking very fast and did not seem to like my father from the get-go. We were placed in a small white room and the man asked my father if he would like anything to eat. My father agreed to have a sandwich. I to1d the man that my father is Muslim so if he could please make sure it didn’t have ham or bacon on it. The man then left and the door was locked, which concerned my father.

Eventually, the man returned with a sandwich. My father asked him why the door was locked. The man responded that it should not have been. My father asked him again why it was if it shouldn’t have been. The man roughly shoved the sandwich at my dad and said ”you’re welcome for your dinner,” as he angrily walked out the door. The meat was very pink and my father was concerned that it was ham. I to1d him could eat a bite to see, but he did not want me eating it. He expressed concern to me for our safety and that something was “fishy.” At this point the door was unlocked and my dad began to wander the assessment center. I went up to the nurses station and asked if it was alright that he do so and they said yes. I informed them that he was growing worried, to which they did not respond. His nurse then came and told me that a ”woman who claims she has his baby” was in the waiting room wanting to know what was happening. I was initially confused by the strange wording but then it occurred to me that she must have been speaking of my mother and that I must be the “baby.” The nurse ask if my mother should come back but since my dad was growing increasingly concerned about the environment and our safety, I felt having her there would add to his concerns. I asked if they could do anything to try to calm his fears.  My father then found the door that lead out of the assessment center and discovered it was locked. My father asked why. The nurses responded that he could not leave until he saw a doctor, and he raised his voice, saying that he would be leaving and they needed to unlock the door. They shouted back that they wouldn’t unlock it. I asked my father to calm down but he was very concerned for my own safety and determined to get me out of this environment. He shouted again to open the door and then shakily grabbed a chair to try to push the door open with. At that point, the large man with the attitude raced out from the nurse station and grabbed and twisting my father with a hold taking him to the ground and landing on top of him. My father is a skinny, somewhat frail man, in his 60s. An older nurse then escorted me out of the assessment center, saying I “didn’t need to see what would happen next.”

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Eventually he is seen by a physician and late that evening they found he had sustained a broken hip and a concussion and transferred to the orthopedic unit at another hospital. There was no order authorizing transfer from the regular ER to the locked unit. I can’t see where under our state law this man’s confinement for “emergency observation” was authorized.  K.S.A. 59-2954 “A treatment facility may admit and detain any person presented for emergency observation and treatment upon the written application of any individual . . . stating . . . the applicant’s belief that the person may be a mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment and because of the person’s mental illness is likely to cause harm to self or others if not immediately detained.”

No such belief is noted in the ER record.  Perhaps there is some other provisions of our state law or Federal law which authorized this confinement. Even if that is true, there still may be some negligence in this treatment.

 

A Reader

Filed Under: Tell Your Story

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2024