Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

SSRI’s and Postpartum Hemorrhaging

August 31, 2013 By Phil Hickey |

There’s an interesting study in the British Medical Journal (August 2013).  It’s called Use of antidepressants near delivery and risk of postpartum hemorrhage: cohort study of low income women in the United States, and it was written by Kristin Palmsten et al.

The study examined nationwide Medicaid data from 2000-2007, and followed 106,000 pregnant women aged 12-55 who had been given a “diagnosis” of a mood or anxiety disorder.

The women were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups on the basis of information obtained from Medicaid’s pharmacy dispensing data.  The criterion for categorization was exposure to SRI’s or to Non-SRI’s and the groupings were:

Current exposure  (at delivery date)
Recent exposure   (1-30 days prior to delivery)
Past exposure      (1-5 months prior to delivery)
No exposure

RESULTS

“All types of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors available for analysis and venlafaxine, a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, were significantly associated with postpartum hemorrhage.”

“Compared with no exposure, women with current exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors had a 1.47-fold increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage…and women with current non-serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure had a 1.39-fold increased risk…”

A total of 14,205 women (13.4% of the total) had been taking SRI’s or N-SRI’s at the time of delivery.  An additional 19,473 women (18.3% of the total) had taken SRI’s or N-SRI’s in the previous five months.  Adding these numbers, we can see that a staggering 31% of the women had taken these drugs in the last five months of their pregnancy.

This was a cohort study, not a randomized controlled trial.  The researchers drew from the data base information on all women who were pregnant and had a “diagnosis” of mood disorder or anxiety disorder.  Then they checked antidepressant use against postpartum hemorrhage.  It is possible that the individuals who were taking the pills were also positive for some unmonitored risk factor, and that it was this unknown factor that was causing the excessive hemorrhaging.

However, given that postpartum hemorrhaging is one of the very serious complications of delivery (sometimes leading to the death of the woman), the results of the cohort study should at the very least be a cause for concern.  Of equal concern is the fact that almost a third of the women had taken these drugs during the last five months of their pregnancies.

In the late 80’s/early 90’s, I worked in the chemical dependency field.  At that time, we were seeing a fairly marked increase in the numbers of people coming into treatment units for cocaine addiction.  It was said at the time that dire poverty and unemployment in the inner cities were driving the increase in cocaine use.  In other words, people’s lives were so wretched that they were turning to cocaine for some kind of chemical relief.  I have no way of verifying this information, but it does have a measure of plausibility, and was widely accepted at the time.

With regards to the present research, it is noteworthy that all of the women in the study were poor.  (Medicaid eligibility is assessed on need.)  Pregnancy, childbirth, and childcare, on average, represent a greater burden for poor women than for their more affluent counterparts.  It is well within the realm of possibility that many of these women were having difficulty coping and had mixed feelings at the prospect of bringing a new baby into their world.  It is possible that they were turning to pharmaceutical products for the same reasons that the cocaine addicts turned to cocaine:  to find temporary chemical relief from the burdens of poverty and its entailments.  Psychiatry, of course, won’t countenance this possibility, but rather clings to its inane notion that each of these women has a brain illness, that the drugs are necessary – even life-saving –, and that their benefits outweigh the risks!

So here’s the question:  Is there any essential difference between a poor, unemployed victim of inner-city blight taking cocaine as a temporary relief to feelings of despair on the one hand, and a poor, pregnant woman taking an SRI to alleviate her negative feelings on the other?  This question is particularly pertinent, in that the method of action of cocaine and these pharmaceutical products is essentially similar (inhibition of neurotransmitter reuptake).

Filed Under: A Behavioral Approach to Mental Disorders Tagged With: antidepressants

About Phil Hickey

I am a licensed psychologist, presently retired. I have worked in clinical and managerial positions in the mental health, corrections, and addictions fields in the United States and England. My wife Nancy and I have been married since 1970 and have four grown children.

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2023