Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

Reduction in Neuroleptic Drugs Leads to Better Outcomes: Surprise?

July 6, 2013 By Phil Hickey |

BACKGROUND

Mad in America ran an article (Reduction/Discontinuation of Antipsychotics Produces Higher Long-Term Recovery) on July 3, describing a piece of research on this topic which had been done in Holland.

The original article, by Lex Wunderink, MD PhD et al, was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry (JAMA-P).  You can see an abstract of the article here, but the full text is behind a pay wall.

The background to the study is the widespread psychiatric dogma that once a person has had a psychotic episode, he/she is considered to have an incurable, progressive illness (usually schizophrenia), and should take neuroleptic drugs for life.  This particular piece of dogma – I suppose like all dogma – is highly resistant to contradictory evidence, and has been one of the pillars of psychiatric practice for five or six decades.

The fact that the drugs in question are in fact very potent neurotoxins, and wreak dreadful damage on those who take them, has also had little impact on the official doctrine.

The researchers followed up 128 individuals who had experienced a first-episode psychosis (FEP).  After they had been in remission for 6 months, they were randomly assigned to either a discontinue/reduce group (DR), or to a maintenance treatment (MT) group, and they remained in this status for 18 months.  For the next 5½ years, they were given drugs or not at the discretion of the treating physician.

At the end of the 5½ years, 103 of the individuals were located and consented to receive follow-up assessment.

RESULTS

“The DR patients experienced twice the recovery rate of the MT patients (40.4% vs. 17.6%).”  The probability that this result could have arisen from random factors is less then 1 in 100.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors drew the following conclusions:

“Dose reduction/discontinuation of antipsychotics during the early stages of remitted FEP shows superior long-term recovery rates compared with the rates achieved with MT.” [maintenance treatment]

They caution that as this is the first study to address this issue, clinical implementation should await appropriate corroboration.

COMMENT

Those of us who have seen the effects of these drugs probably will not be surprised by the results.  The more damage you inflict on people’s brains, the less likely they are to cope successfully with the ordinary trials and vicissitudes of life.

It is only in psychiatry that such obvious truths have to be proven.  And, of course, it remains to be seen how psychiatry/pharma will try to spin the result.  After all, reducing and discontinuing drugs is money lost!

 

 

Filed Under: A Behavioral Approach to Mental Disorders Tagged With: neuroleptics

About Phil Hickey

I am a licensed psychologist, presently retired. I have worked in clinical and managerial positions in the mental health, corrections, and addictions fields in the United States and England. My wife Nancy and I have been married since 1970 and have four grown children.

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2023