Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

Separation Anxiety Disorder: Now Also for Adults

April 22, 2013 By Phil Hickey |

BACKGROUND

The “diagnosis” of separation anxiety disorder has been around since DSM-III.  In DSM-IV it is defined as “…excessive anxiety concerning separation from the home or from those to whom the person is attached.”  (DSM-IV-TR p 121).  The APA’s prevalence estimate is 4%.

This “diagnosis” is listed under the heading: “Other Disorders of Infancy, Childhood, or Adolescence.”  One of the criteria is that the problem must begin before age 18, and in practice the “diagnosis” was generally confined to children under the age of 10 or so.

The “diagnosis” of separation anxiety disorder can be critiqued along essentially the same lines as most of the other DSM labels, e.g. lack of identifiable pathology, arbitrariness, fallacious circularity, vagueness in definition and criteria, etc… It can also be pointed out that there are more valid, and incidentally more helpful, ways to conceptualize fears and anxieties.  In addition, giving a child (and his parent) the message that his fear is an illness for which he must take pills rather than a life hurdle to be overcome by effort and encouragement is stigmatizing and disempowering.  Back in the fifties there were always a few kindergarteners who cried and carried on when being dropped off at school, but they were all “cured” (or apparently so) within the first week.

“TREATMENT” OF SEPARATION ANXIETY DISORDER

The University of Rochester Health Encyclopedia (here) has this to say on the “treatment” of separation anxiety disorder.

“Treatment recommendations may include cognitive behavioral therapy for the child, with the focus being to help the child or adolescent learn skills to manage his or her anxiety and to help him or her master the situations that contribute to the anxiety. Some children may also benefit from treatment with antidepressant or antianxiety medication to help them feel calmer.”

In practice, of course, the cognitive behavioral therapy recommendation is ignored and the child eats pills.  The Wikipedia article specifically mentions SSRIs.

DSM-5

All of this is bad enough, but coming shortly in DSM-5 we will have separation anxiety disorder for adults!

So adults who are excessively anxious on being separated from their children or from other significant figures are now mentally ill.  And this change is based, not on some recent scientific discovery or insight, but simply because the APA say so.  And who, you might wonder, decides how much anxiety is excessive?  The psychiatrists.

It’s business as usual.  More “diagnostic” creep; more stigmatization; more disempowerment; and of course, more drugs!  If you were thinking that the psychiatrists might be having second thoughts concerning their marriage to pharma, you were wrong.  The marriage is thriving.

DISEMPOWERMENT

Gone is the notion that fears are to be conquered through application, effort, and social support.  Gone is the notion of families and friends rallying around a member in trouble and helping him through a rough patch.  Because today there are no rough patches.  What we, naively, used to think of as rough patches have been transformed by the wisdom of psychiatry into mental illnesses.

And so it goes.  These people will never stop until everybody has a “diagnosis” and everybody is taking drugs.  Psychiatry, with its pathetically naïve and simplistic handbook of human problems and its pill-for-every-problem philosophy is a destroyer of people.  Please speak out.  Stop the madness.

 

 

Filed Under: A Behavioral Approach to Mental Disorders Tagged With: dealing with problems of daily living, DSM-5, expansion of psychiatric turf, myth of mental illness, over-medicalization of everyday life

About Phil Hickey

I am a licensed psychologist, presently retired. I have worked in clinical and managerial positions in the mental health, corrections, and addictions fields in the United States and England. My wife Nancy and I have been married since 1970 and have four grown children.

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2023