Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

Another Marketing Ploy: Promoting Mental Health Evaluations

March 22, 2013 By Phil Hickey |

Recently, courtesy of Hersteltalent on Twitter, I came across this newspaper article: Doctors Urge Mental Health Screenings with Physicals.  It appeared in USA Today, and was written by Jessica Contrera of the Lafayette, Indiana Journal and Courier.  Dateline March 12.

The gist of the article, which is written for the general public, is that when you go in to your doctor for a check-up, you should ask for a mental evaluation as well.  The article reminds us that “25% of American adults suffer from some form of mental illness each year.”

We are also informed that many people “attempt to cope” with these illnesses for an average of 10 years.  This factoid is attributed to an organization called Mental Health America.

The author also tells us that “a new study from the University of Cambridge suggests everyone should get their mental health checked as often as they have an annual physical” (which I suppose would be once a year?)

Patti Wollenburg, executive director of NAMI, is also quoted:

“People shouldn’t be apprehensive about going to a psychiatrist,” Wollenburg said. “Mental health is just as important as physical health. You just need to take care of both.”

I tried to track down the “new study from the University of Cambridge,” but without success.  The Great Google, however, did point out that the exact same phrase occurred in another article – this one by Rick Nauert, PhD, Senior News Editor for PsychCentral.   It’s called:  Mental Health Checkups as Important as Annual Physicals.”  Dr. Nauert provides a little more information on the “new study.”  He intimates (without actually stating) that it was written by Barbara Sahakian, “a leading UK neuroscientist.”  Dr. Sahakian is quoted as saying:

“As a society, we take our mental health for granted…. But just like our bodies, it is important to keep our brains fit.”

(Note the neat slide from “mental” to “brain.”)  Dr. Sahakian is also quoted as saying:

“We need to educate the public about what to look for and make them aware of the importance of early detection and intervention.”

Later in Dr. Nauert’s article, he mentions Dr. Sahakian’s “presentation,” so perhaps it was a lecture rather than a paper.  In any event, I can’t find any recent paper by Dr. Sahakian on this subject.  I have written to Dr. Nauert asking for a reference, but have not heard back.

Readers might be interested to know that Mental Health America, in the first half of 2011, received $346,850 from pharmaceutical companies.  (I have been unable to find more recent figures.)  This was 90% of the total funding listed on their website.

NAMI, of course, has been supported by pharmaceutical money for years.

And Dr. Sahakian, in another paper (“A UK strategy for mental health and wellbeing” – May 2010) acknowledges that she “consults for … several drug companies.”

Of course the fact that people and organizations are in the pay of pharmaceutical companies doesn’t necessarily mean that this contaminates their views.

But…what I see in all this is yet another pharma marketing ploy.  Perhaps next they will put toys in cereal boxes with the words “Remember to ask Mommy to take you for your mental health check. 🙂 ” Or how about mandatory mental health screenings before newborns can be removed from the hospital?

 

 

Filed Under: A Behavioral Approach to Mental Disorders Tagged With: conflict of interest, myth of mental illness, over-medicalization of everyday life, pharmaceutical industry

About Phil Hickey

I am a licensed psychologist, presently retired. I have worked in clinical and managerial positions in the mental health, corrections, and addictions fields in the United States and England. My wife Nancy and I have been married since 1970 and have four grown children.

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2023