Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

Cold-blooded Killers

February 5, 2013 By Phil Hickey |

Last Saturday our local newspaper ran an article called “Mental Health Needs Reform.”  It was written by a psychologist, and the main thrust of the piece was that if “serious mental health care reform” is not implemented, we will see more mass murders similar to those at Aurora and Newtown.

The article contained several unwarranted assumptions, and recommended that mental hospitals “rebuild facilities for treating those patients.”

My position, of course, is that there are no mental illnesses, and that cold-blooded killers are not sick in any meaningful sense of the term, but are, rather, individuals who have not internalized an age-appropriate respect for the lives and welfare of other human beings.

In my view, no amount of additional funding in the mental health system will have the slightest impact on this problem, and I have discussed these issues elsewhere.

My purpose in writing this post, however, is to draw attention to a footnote to the newspaper piece, indicating that the author “…wrote this article for the Independence Institute, a free market think tank in Denver.”

So I did a little research on the Independence Institute.  Here’s what I found.

They are a conservative think tank based in Golden, Colorado.  They hold an annual Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Party to promote drinking, smoking and shooting as a “fundamental right.”  Their President, Jon Caldera, is quoted as saying, “Now remember, a year from now President [Barack] Obama might make all three activities of smoking, drinking and shooting completely illegal. This might be our very, very last opportunity.”

The Independence Institute has provided several media platforms to James Taylor of the Heartland Institute.  The Heartland Institute has reportedly received funding and support from pharmaceutical companies GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly.

The Independence Institute also has ties to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which is a corporate bill mill.  ALEC is a corporation-funded forum in which large corporations give their “wish lists” to state legislators.  Many of these wish lists are subsequently enacted into law.

So, we have a short, innocuous-looking article by a local psychologist in a Saturday morning newspaper calling for mental health reform.  But even a few minutes of research suggests that there is a great deal more to the picture.  Nationwide, powerful forces are calling for mental health reform as the solution to the increase in mass murders.

Why are they doing this?  I can think of three obvious reasons:  firstly, to increase the sales of pharmaceutical products; secondly, to distract attention from other issues; and thirdly, to encourage a large-scale mental hospital building program.  In my view the mental health centers and their pharmaceutical allies, with their responsibility-absolving “diagnoses,” their pill-for-every-problem philosophy, and their systematic disempowerment of parents, are a part of the problem.  Any increase in the scope or reach of these services is more likely to make things worse rather than better.

The fact is that something is very wrong in America.  We have a problem – a huge increase in pre-planned, cold-blooded mass murders.  Something has gone wrong with our culture, our childrearing, our values, and our respect for one another.  We should be studying this problem with honesty and integrity, and implementing meaningful solutions.  Amazingly, however, the CDC has been barred from conducting research in this area.  Instead, we have powerful corporations and individuals using this problem, and the public’s legitimate concern, to promote their own selfish agendas.  And legislators, bought and paid for, play along.  Have we completely lost our way?

 

Filed Under: A Behavioral Approach to Mental Disorders Tagged With: conflict of interest, expansion of psychiatric turf, pharmaceutical industry

About Phil Hickey

I am a licensed psychologist, presently retired. I have worked in clinical and managerial positions in the mental health, corrections, and addictions fields in the United States and England. My wife Nancy and I have been married since 1970 and have four grown children.

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2024