Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

Natural Correction

July 10, 2011 By Phil Hickey |

The central theme of this blog is that there are no mental illnesses and that the spurious medicalization of problems of living represents a tragic wrong turn in human history.

In a comment on my last post, Nanu Grewal raised the question of a natural correction.  In other words, does there come a point where the nonsense is so outrageous that some corrective force emerges which would undermine and even supplant the present illogical system.  In my view this is an excellent question.

I used to think that the insurance companies might provide such a correction, by simply refusing to pay for this so-called treatment (as they did with inpatient substance abuse treatment in the early 1990’s.)

But this simply hasn’t happened.  Indeed here in the U.S. we’ve recently enacted a parity law whereby insurance companies are required to cover the so-called mental illnesses on an equal footing with real illnesses.  This makes it virtually impossible for insurance companies to start clamping down now.

I have sometimes wondered if the cost of the mental health system would become too great a burden on the public purse, and that some corrective measures would be undertaken.  Most public support of healthcare in the U.S. is through Medicare and Medicaid, and it is widely reported that these programs are under a good deal of financial strain.  Most of the suggestions in this regard, however, have been on the lines of requiring individuals to pay more than they already do, rather than eliminating, or even reducing, the mental illness services.  So I see no great ray of hope in that area.

And of course over and above all of this is the fact that a great many people simply like to take drugs, and this is a powerful drive which tends to maintain the status quo.

Through the years there have been a number of individual writers who have seen through the nonsense and who have spoken out fearlessly.  In recent years perhaps we’ve seen a little more of this, but it certainly hasn’t become a groundswell of protest.  But perhaps that is the best natural correction that we can hope for – more and more individuals speaking out, exposing the spurious nature of the so-called mental illnesses and the tragic consequences of the drugs-for-every-problem philosophy.

Anyway, I can think of nothing else on the horizon.  I’d be interested if any readers had any thoughts.  Can you see any natural corrections in the works?  Are there things we could be doing to promote natural corrections?

 

Filed Under: A Behavioral Approach to Mental Disorders

About Phil Hickey

I am a licensed psychologist, presently retired. I have worked in clinical and managerial positions in the mental health, corrections, and addictions fields in the United States and England. My wife Nancy and I have been married since 1970 and have four grown children.

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2023