Behaviorism and Mental Health

Alternative perspective on psychiatry's so-called mental disorders | PHILIP HICKEY, PH.D.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Tell Your Story
  • Submit Your Story
  • Moderation Policy

Nutrition and Psychosis

June 11, 2013 By Phil Hickey |

It is well known that nutrition is important, and that a great many people today – of all ages – are not receiving adequate nutrition.  It’s a huge subject, and is covered on lots of websites.

A few days ago (June 7), there was an article on Mad in America called Can Psychosis be Treated with Nutrition?  It was written by Bonnie Kaplan, PhD and Julia Rucklidge, PhD.

The article is about a boy, whom the authors call Andrew (not his real name).  He had some early developmental problems, and by age 10 was displaying hallucinatory and delusional behavior.  He spent six months in a mental hospital, and was prescribed a wide range of psychoactive drugs, including neuroleptics.  His overall level of functioning on discharge was about the same as it was on admission.

After discharge, at his parents’ request, Andrew’s psychiatrist tapered his pharmaceutical drugs to zero, and started him on a “broad spectrum nutrient formula.”  The results were spectacular.  All his “symptoms” had remitted in a few months, and the gains have been maintained.

The authors suggest that this kind of nutrient treatment “should be considered for virtually all first-episode psychosis.”

ON THE OTHER HAND

You’ll find a story here of a man “with schizophrenia” who also transitioned from “anti-psychotic medication” to the same nutrient formula as Andrew used.  (It’s marketed as EMPowerplus).  This young man, Jordan Ramsey, shortly afterwards killed his father and gravely injured his mother.

John Grohol, PhD, has written an article on this topic on PsychCentral.

Here’s his conclusion:

“I will end with this — I have respect for both Mr. Hardy and Mr. Stephan [the providers of EMPowerplus] for trying to help people in need with something they believe works to help alleviate mental illness. It’s my opinion that their intentions are apparently good and well-grounded, but their follow-through with adequate research and the over-hyping of their product leaves much to be desired.”

Vitamins and micronutrients in proper quantities probably won’t do much harm.  But they can be over-hyped.  Dr. Grohol states that “…after more than a decade on the market, the manufacturers of this product haven’t done a single placebo-controlled trial.”

In my view, a double-blind randomized controlled trial is overdue for a product for which such strong claims are being made.

Filed Under: A Behavioral Approach to Mental Disorders Tagged With: nutrition

About Phil Hickey

I am a licensed psychologist, presently retired. I have worked in clinical and managerial positions in the mental health, corrections, and addictions fields in the United States and England. My wife Nancy and I have been married since 1970 and have four grown children.

 

Recent Articles

  • AND FINALLY
  • RESPONDING TO DR. MOREHEAD’S SECOND ATTACK ON ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
  • DR. PIES STILL TRYING TO EXCULPATE PSYCHIATRY FOR THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE THEORY OF DEPRESSION
  • RESPONDING TO DANIEL MOREHEAD, MD,  PSYCHIATRY’S LATEST CHAMPION
  • PROBLEMS AT A COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • THE ENIGMA-MDD PROJECT: SEARCHING FOR THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF “MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER”
  • ILLNESSES OR LOOSE COLLECTIONS OF VAGUELY DESCRIBED PROBLEMS?
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 2
  • WHY IS PSYCHIATRY SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT CRITICISM OF PSYCHIATRY? Part 1
  • ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF MENTAL HEALTH – OR PERHAPS NOT

The phrase "mental health" as used in the name of this website is simply a term of convenience. It specifically does not imply that the human problems embraced by this term are illnesses, or that their absence constitutes health. Indeed, the fundamental tenet of this site is that there are no mental illnesses, and that conceptualizing human problems in this way is spurious, destructive, disempowering, and stigmatizing.

Disclaimer

The purpose of this website is to provide a forum where current practices and ideas in the mental health field can be critically examined and discussed. It is not possible in this kind of context to provide psychological help or advice to individuals who may read this site, and nothing written here should be construed in this manner. Readers seeking psychological help should consult a qualified practitioner in their own local area. They should explain their concerns to this person and develop a trusting working relationship. It is only in a one-to-one relationship of this kind that specific advice should be given or taken.

Privacy Policy

Popular Topics…

ADHD akathisia alcohol alcohol/drugs antidepressants antipsychotics anxiety benzodiazepines bipolar books worth reading case study chemical imbalance theory conflict of interest dealing with problems of daily living dementia dependence depression drug DSM DSM-5 ECT expansion of psychiatric turf IF THEY'RE NOT ILLNESSES WHAT ARE THEY? involuntary commitment Mad in America major tranquilizers myth of chemical imbalance myth of mental illness neuroleptics over-medicalization of everyday life parenting pharmaceutical industry placebo posttraumatic stress disorder Psychiatric "spin" research corruption schizophrenia shock "treatment" side effects somatic symptom disorder SSRI's suicide survivors of psychiatry tardive dyskinesia violence

© 2009–2025