Homosexuality: The Mental Illness That Went Away

by Phil Hickey on October 8, 2011

Post edited and updated January 2, 2013, to reflect clarifications as a result of interactions with the many people who have left comments.  I thank them for their input.

********************

According to the American Psychiatric Association, until 1974 homosexuality was a mental illness.  Freud had alluded to homosexuality numerous times in his writings, and had concluded that paranoia and homosexuality were inseparable.  Other psychiatrists wrote copiously on the subject, and homosexuality was “treated” on a wide basis.  There was little or no suggestion within the psychiatric community that homosexuality might be conceptualized as anything other than a mental illness that needed to be treated.  And, of course, homosexuality was listed as a mental illness in DSM-II.  (The DSM – Diagnostic and Statistical Manual – is the APA’s standard classification of their so-called mental disorders, and is used by many mental health workers in the USA and other countries.)

Then in 1970 gay activists protested against the APA convention in San Francisco.  These scenes were repeated in 1971, and as people came out of the “closet” and felt empowered politically and socially, the APA directorate became increasingly uncomfortable with their stance.  In 1973 the APA’s nomenclature task force recommended that homosexuality be declared normal.  The trustees were not prepared to go that far, but they did vote to remove homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses by a vote of 13 to 0, with 2 abstentions.  This decision was confirmed by a vote of the APA membership, and homosexuality was no longer listed in the seventh edition of DSM-II, which was issued in 1974.

What’s noteworthy about this is that the removal of homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses was not triggered by some scientific breakthrough.  There was no new fact or set of facts that stimulated this major change.  Rather, it was the simple reality that gay people started to kick up a fuss.  They gained a voice and began to make themselves heard.  And the APA reacted with truly astonishing speed.  And with good reason. They realized intuitively that a protracted battle would have drawn increasing attention to the spurious nature of their entire taxonomy.  So they quickly “cut loose” the gay community and forestalled any radical scrutiny of the DSM system generally.

The APA claimed that they made the change because new research showed that most homosexual people were content with their sexual orientation, and that as a group, they appeared to be as well-adjusted as heterosexual people.  I suggest, however, that these research findings were simply the APA’s face-saver.  For centuries, perhaps millennia, homosexual people had clung to their sexual orientation despite the most severe persecution and vilification, including imprisonment and death.  Wouldn’t this suggest that they were happy with their orientation?  Do we need research to confirm this?  And if we do, shouldn’t we also need research to confirm that heterosexual people are happy with their orientation?  And if poor adjustment is critical to a diagnosis of mental illness, where was the evidence of this that justified making homosexuality a mental illness in the first place?

Also noteworthy is the fact that the vote of the membership was by no means unanimous.  Only about 55% of the members who voted favored the change.

Of course, the APA put the best spin they could on these events.  The fact is that they altered their taxonomy because of intense pressure from the gay community, but they claimed that the change was prompted by research findings.

So all the people who had this terrible “illness” were “cured” overnight – by a vote!  I remember as a boy reading of the United Nations World Health Organization’s decision to eradicate smallpox.  This was in 1967, and by 1977, after a truly staggering amount of work, the disease was a thing of the past.  Why didn’t they just take a vote?  Because smallpox is a real illness.  The human problems listed in DSM are not.  It’s that simple.  You can say that geese are swans – but in reality they’re still geese.

The overall point being that the APA’s taxonomy is nothing more than self-serving nonsense.  Real illnesses are not banished by voting or by fiat, but by valid science and hard work.  There are no mental illnesses.  Rather, there are people.  We have problems; we have orientations; we have habits; we have perspectives.  Sometimes we do well, other times we make a mess of things.  We are complicated.  Our feelings fluctuate with our circumstances, from the depths of despondency to the pinnacles of bliss.  And perhaps, most of all, we are individuals.  DSM’s facile and self-serving attempt to medicalize human problems is an institutionalized insult to human dignity.  The homosexual community has managed to liberate themselves from psychiatric oppression.  But there are millions of people worldwide who are still being damaged, stigmatized, and disempowered by this pernicious system to this day.

  • kz do

    Pedophilia is a crime in most arab countries. Saudi Arabia and Yemen are not the “norm” for arab countries. It’s exactly like when arabs say the “west”, but France is not the U.S, and Germany is not Australia. Out of subject but I had to interfere.

  • David M

    My niece did exactly that. She woke up one day and decided to be a lesbian. How do I know that, I asked her.

    But in reality she isn’t a lesbian though she lives the lesbian lifestyle.

    She decided she’d become a lesbian when her man had an affair. Yup, that’s exactly how it happened. How do I know this, because she told me.

    I keep hearing that no one makes a choice to be a lesbian or a homosexual and I’ve spoken to 3 people (to be honest it was 3 females) and none of the 3 say that they’ve always felt sexual desires for a person of the same sex. Not as children or even pre-teens. All three were able to break down the year they decided they’d become a lesbian.

    This sure threw a wrench in what I had been taught was a homosexual or lesbian.

    So what I’ve learned in my short 50something years of life is that most people can change their mind or perception on what is acceptable (or cool) and what is not.

    If you think that isn’t true look at today’s teenager and compare him or her with a teenager from 50 years ago. Today in most public schools it’s cool to be bisexual (this applies most to girls), because hey there are some pretty cool people who claim to be gay. And for the girls, guys get just twitterpated with the idea of two girls getting it on, this makes the bisexual girl more popular with guys.

    In the last 50 years people have been coerced or evolved into accepting homosexual behavior as normal. There have been several tactics used, first they make themselves look like victims, then they make themselves become very likeable by becoming comedians and now they are militant in their demands. This is the evolution of the gay agenda.

  • Peter Hyatt

    Pedophilia is moving towards “disability” in Greece. School children can now “announce” their gender, and this can change, day to day. Personally, I’m transitioning into a person who is sick of Bruce Jenner.

  • Peter Hyatt

    The Koran and the life of Mohammad allow for pedophilia. This is why Europe (Scandinavia, specifically) has become the new rape capital of the world. Islamic example of Mohammad with his 9 year old wife, and the imitation of Mohammad has degraded women and the stoning of homosexuals by Muslims goes uncondemned in America by main stream media. The Islamic terrorists shout, “Islamophobia” and the gay right organizations go silent.

  • Pablo Aguila

    Down with the political correctness. I agree with your POV. I have to add this: because I am a six-footer, athletic somehow handsome man, I have been harassed by homosexuals, repeatedly. They do not take your refusal with a smile. Also, I notice homosexuals who brandish their gayness “proudly” are not too prone to be criticized.
    If you have kids, talk to them about these issues. Teach them every human is the sum of a feminine and a masculine part.
    A MAN can use his feminine half to admire Art, to admire beauty. Nothing wrong with that.
    Now, if you feel inclined to use your feminine part to have sex with other man…

  • DavidSayre

    I’ve been aware of this for years. The dirty little secret is that homosexuality is the only psychological disorder with it’s own political lobby.

    None of the debates or talking points I’ve heard stand up to empirical science, the
    scientific method, or even Sagan’s Baloney Detection Kit. Generally speaking, the patients in an asylum are too close to the problem to be the ones to define it. Dilution is an impediment to reality. This also calls into question a doctor’s ethics, as the first rule of medicine has always been, do no harm.

    Several years ago, a national talk show host told a call that he, the host, was a male lesbian, in that he was a woman, born in a man’s body, who loves women. If that sounds “crazy”… oh well.

    You can not have a civil society, a healthy society, where you accommodate dilution.
    Attempting to declare something as real, that isn’t, is not helping anyone.

  • grandie

    The Virgin Mary was most likely a teen mom, but that wasn’t taboo back then. Life expectancy was 45 to 50 years, and girls were married off as soon as they hit puberty.

    Some accounts say that Mary, a Jewish woman from Nazareth, may have been as young as 12.

  • sublime23in

    The bible has nothing to do with science.

  • James Cunningham
  • James Cunningham
  • SpinninginCircles

    Alice Bailey wrote “10 steps to NWO” based on the Occult in the 1920’s. It’s ironic that her social engineering seminal work draws heavily from the planks of Marxism and that we have a cacophony politicians/elites in America at present continually talking about a new world government. The central thrust of her minor opus was the dissolution of the family, destruction of norms, promotion of homosexuality, sexualization of children and replacing parents with the state; “common core.” I have much respect for the fight that gay men fought with Act Up, I believe all people should have same civil rights under the law and admire their achievements. However, I wholeheartedly disagree with hetero-shaming, Christian-shaming and the bullying that the gay community feels so adamant about that they have started with Terry Bean (charged w pedo-rape, pending) anti-bullying programs in our schools. As we speak UN is forcing grade school children to cross dress, in fact parents are protesting in the streets of Italy as we speak(not that we would know with our press). Just remember the Pink Swastika the pedastry Hegelian Nazis instituted these same morays along with disarming the German population of small arms. We are at the door. We are unlocking the door with seceding our sovereignty thru just signed TAA, TPA and TPP. Remember the Nazis just didn’t kill Jews. I ask you to look at the great purges of the 20th century Mao, Pol Pot Hitler and Stalin all financed by someone, all shaped by someone all in the west. These great purges consumed/Murdered somewhere in the neighborhood of 150 million people. Whom was killed?, anyone who disagreed with the state. Solidarity is what we need in the face of such a great threat but alas we are all divided, mislead and apathetic. I truly believe ones only path is thru the 3 big books. Good Luck and God Bless.

  • Maybe?

    You mean pedophiles don’t have a choice? Bank robbers don’t have a choice? What about rapist?

    We all have free will and therefore choices, even if the consequences are exceptionally high.

    By your deluded logic, terrorism is acceptable!

    Not the sharpest tool in the shed…are ya?

  • Spectrum

    And how do you think scientific laws and principles became established ?

  • Spectrum

    Science is the tool which God uses to demonstrate the glory of His Creation.

  • Spectrum

    Yep. Paedophiles are now being redefined ( and sanitised ) as “minor attracted persons”. The first step to the normalising of it, as has happened with homosexuality.

  • Lynn lindall

    https://www.nami.org/…/M…
    National Alliance for the Mentally Ill ‑ NAMIA mental illness
    is a condition that impacts a person’s thinking, feeling or mood may
    affect and his or her ability to relate to others and function on a
    daily basis.

  • Lynn lindall

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…/adoptions-spiked-amon...
    The Huffington PostOct 21, 2011 – The number of gays and lesbians adopting children has nearly tripled in the past decade despite discriminatory rules in many states, according to an … of same sex couples raising kids is actually declining, said Gary Gates,

  • Pingback: If Love Wins, Why So Much Hate? - Absolutely Ali Kat()

  • cajaquarius

    [mental illness is a condition that impacts a person’s thinking, feeling or mood may affect and his or her ability to relate to others and function on a daily basis.]

    … in a negative way.

    If we go with your definition but do not qualify it by stating that we are referring to those features that negatively impact people then my artistic nature is a mental illness. My love of dark chocolate is a mental illness. My being good at math is a mental illness. And so on.

  • Hannah32

    You are wrong. The NIH tracks “gay” illnesses and U S. Gays come up the overwhelming winners, or losers depending on your point of view. Women don’t even come in a close second.

  • Roy Jung

    Jesus! The ignorance posted on this blog is astounding! Especially following such a well written article. If sexual orientation is a “choice”, then YOU choose to change yours and let me know how that works out for you! Ignorance certainly is bliss … my God!

Previous post:

Next post: